Before the French and Dutch referendums, I predicted that, if our neighbours voted “No”, the EU would ignore the result and implement the constitution as though nothing had happened. The Brussels elites have followed the script to the letter. JosÃ© Manuel DurrÃ£o Barroso, Jacques Chirac, Barbara Windsor and Sid James present Carry on Regardless. Two weeks after the referendums, the European Parliament voted through dozens of Bills that cited the constitution as the source of their authority. One which happened to catch my eye was a report proposing that the British and French representatives on the UN Security Council be merged into a single EU seat. The judicial basis for such a development, said the report, was “the European Constitutional Treaty, which creates a legal personality for the Union and a European Minister for Foreign Affairs”. No one was so indelicate as to point out that, without the constitution, the EU has no treaty-making powers. Instead, we carried on as though nothing had changed.
Almost to a man, Commissioners and MEPs have decreed that the process should continue. The EU is going ahead as though the French and Dutch electorates had voted “Yes”, harmonising criminal justice, creating a European Public Prosecutor, establishing a diplomatic service, treating the Charter of Fundamental Rights as justiciable. The constitution is not being smuggled in through the back door; it is swaggering brazenly across the porch.
This sure seems like a Marxists totalitarian attitude to me; I mean the people voted no, and they are just ignoring them. the people in Europe better wake up and show some outrage before they find themselves under the control of the EU with no say in its governance.
Hat tip to Outside The Beltway
Previous related articles:
The EU Takes Another Hit
The Dutch Just Say No to the EU Constitution
European Unionâââs Constitution In Trouble
French Prime Minister Steps Down After Failed EU Vote
Solana issues warning over French EU vote
Javier Solana And The EU
France Poised To Vote No on EU
Collectivism vs. Individualism